Volume 10, Issue 4 (Autumn 2024)                   Caspian J Neurol Sci 2024, 10(4): 312-324 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.UMSU.AEC.1401.014


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abbaszadeh M E, Pourheydar B, Farjah G. Effects of Crocin, Azithromycin, and Their Co-administration on Sciatic Nerve Injury in Rats. Caspian J Neurol Sci 2024; 10 (4) :312-324
URL: http://cjns.gums.ac.ir/article-1-697-en.html
1- Department of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
2- Department of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran. , pourheydar.b@umsu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1172 Views)
Background: Although peripheral nerve injury is not life-threatening, it causes significant disability. Following these damages, ischemia and inflammatory processes occur, resulting in neurological dysfunction. Several medications have been explored to alleviate the symptoms of peripheral nerve injury.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate how crocin (CR) and azithromycin (AZ) affected sciatic nerve crush injuries in rats.
Materials & Methods: Five groups were established using 40 adult male rats: control, lesion, AZ, CR and AZ+CR. Except for the control group, sciatic nerve injury was surgically induced in the other groups. AZ and CR were administered alone or together to three treatment groups for seven days. Following the behavioral evaluations, sections of the sciatic nerve were stained for immunohistochemical, histological and morphometric assessment.
Results: CR treatment’s efficacy was more pronounced than AZ’s (P≤0.001). CR was found to be less efficacious than combination therapy involving AZ and CR, as determined by sciatic functional index (P≤0.001), hot plate (P≤0.001), and immunohistochemical analysis (P≤0.001). In the remaining evaluations, no significant difference existed between the AZ+CR and CR groups (P> 0.05).
Conclusion: This study found that both AZ and CR significantly improved the recovery of sciatic nerve injuries in rats, with CR being more effective. The combination of AZ and CR showed even greater benefits in some assessments compared to CR alone, although no significant differences were observed in other evaluations. These findings suggest that CR is a promising treatment for peripheral nerve injury and that combination therapy may enhance certain aspects of recovery.
Full-Text [PDF 2275 kb]   (318 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (463 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2024/02/18 | Accepted: 2024/08/16 | Published: 2024/10/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Caspian Journal of Neurological Sciences

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb