Volume 4, Issue 13 (Spring 2018)                   Caspian.J.Neurol.Sci 2018, 4(13): 49-56 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ezzati K, Salavati M, Abdollahi I, Shakeri H, Esmaili K. The Consistency and Construct Validity of Wolf Motor Function Test With Functional Variables and SF-36 Questionnaire in Iranian Stroke Patients. Caspian.J.Neurol.Sci. 2018; 4 (13) :49-56
URL: http://cjns.gums.ac.ir/article-1-159-en.html
1- Neuroscience Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
2- Department of Physiotherapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Physiotherapist, Rasht, Iran
Abstract:   (197 Views)

Background: One of the most important indicators for assessing the validity of a scale is the determination of the construct validity of that scale. Since no standard gold test exists to measure the upper limb function in patients with stroke, the study of the construct validity of the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is of particular importance.
Objectives: To evaluate the construct validity of the scores of the Persian version of the WMFT with functional variables, as well as to verify its convergence validity with the physical component summary of the SF-36 Health Survey, and its discriminant validity with the mental component summary of SF-36 Health Survey.
Materials & Methods: The tests were conducted on 56 patients with stroke, and the scores were calculated. By using this data, the construct validity of the Wolf scale and the convergence and discriminant validity of the scores derived from the Persian version of WMFT, and the physical and mental component summary of the SF-36 Health Survey were obtained.
Results: There was no significant correlation between the age and duration of the stroke in patients, and the total functional score and the median time of performing the tasks of the Persian version of WMFT (P>0.05). No significant difference was seen between the sexes in terms of the total score of performing tasks, but the median time of performing the tasks was significantly different between men and women (P=0.04). There was a moderate statistical correlation between the scores of the Persian version of WMFT and the physical component summary (r=0.60, P<0.001 and r²=0.74), and the mental component summary of SF-36 Health Survey (r=0.60, P<0.001 and r²=0.82). 
Conclusion: The Persian version of WMFT has acceptable construct validity with functional variables and the overall score of the SF-36 questionnaire.

Full-Text [PDF 979 kb]   (125 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (34 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2017/06/28 | Accepted: 2017/04/1 | Published: 2017/12/5

References
1. Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, van Wijck F. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Libr. 2014; 1-172. [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2] [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2]
2. Faria-Fortini I, Michaelsen SM, Cassiano JG, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Upper extremity function in stroke subjects: relationships between the international classification of functioning, disability, and health domains. J Hand Ther. 2011; 24(3):257-65. [DOI: 0.1016/j.jht.2011.01.002] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2011.01.002] [PMID]
3. Hartigan I, O'Connell E, McCarthy G, O'Mahony D. First time stroke survivors perceptions of their health status and their goals for recovery. Int J Nurs Midw. 2011; 3(1):22-9.
4. Baker K, Cano SJ, Playford ED. Outcome measurement in stroke. Stroke. 2011; 42(6):1787-94. [DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.608505] [PMID]
5. Lang CE, Bland MD, Bailey RR, Schaefer SY, Birkenmeier RL. Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: Foundations for clinical decision making. J Hand Ther. 2013; 26(2):104-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2012.06.005] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2012.06.005]
6. Edwards DF, Lang CE, Wagner JM, Birkenmeier R, Dromerick AW. An evaluation of the Wolf Motor Function Test in motor trials early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93(4):660-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.005] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.005]
7. Ezzati K, Salavati M, Abdollahi I, Shakeri H, Esmaili K. Persian translation, internal consistency and reliability of wolf motor function test. Caspian J Neurol Sci. 2017; 3(8):9-16. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.cjns.3.8.9] [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.cjns.3.8.9]
8. Cabral DL, Laurentino GE, Damascena CG, Faria CD, Melo PG, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Comparisons of the Nottingham Health Profile and the SF-36 health survey for the assessment of quality of life in individuals with chronic stroke. Braz J Phys Ther. 2012; 16(4):301-8. [DOI:10.1590/S1413-35552012005000029] [DOI:10.1590/S1413-35552012005000029]
9. Cerniauskaite M, Quintas R, Koutsogeorgou E, Meucci P, Sattin D, Leonardi M, et al. Quality-of-life and disability in patients with stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 91(13):39-47. [DOI:10.1097/PHM.0b013e31823d4df7] [PMID] [DOI:10.1097/PHM.0b013e31823d4df7]
10. Olsson B and Sunnerhagen K. Effects of day hospital rehabilitation after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006; 15(3):106-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2006.03.005] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2006.03.005]
11. Ones K, Yilmaz E, Cetinkaya B, and et al. Quality of life for patients post-stroke and the factors affecting It. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005; 14:261-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2005.07.003] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2005.07.003]
12. Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W. Effect of age on functional outcomes after Stroke Rehabilitation. Stroke. 2002; 33:179-85. [DOI:10.1161/hs0102.101224] [PMID] [DOI:10.1161/hs0102.101224]
13. Black-Schaffer RM, Winston C. Age and functional outcome after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004; 11:23-32. [DOI:10.1310/DNJU-9VUH-BXU2-DJYU] [PMID] [DOI:10.1310/DNJU-9VUH-BXU2-DJYU]
14. Bugge C, Hagen S, Alexander H. Measuring stroke patients' health status in the early post-stroke phase using the SF36. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001; 38:319–27. [DOI:10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00066-3] [DOI:10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00066-3]
15. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Morgan B. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 2001; 32:1635-9. [DOI:10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1635] [PMID] [DOI:10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1635]
16. Domholdt E. Physical therapy research: Principles and applications. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000.
17. Carod-Artal J, Egido JA, Gonzalez J, et al. Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke. Stroke. 2000; 31:2995-99. [DOI:10.1161/01.STR.31.12.2995] [PMID] [DOI:10.1161/01.STR.31.12.2995]
18. Hacking H, Post MW, Schepers VP. A comparison of 3 generic health status questionnaires among stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006; 15(6):235-40. [DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2006.06.004] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2006.06.004]
19. Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2014; 384(9958):1929-35. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60584-5] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60584-5]
20. Fischer U, Arnold M, Nedeltchev K, Brekenfeld C, Ballinari P, Remonda L, et al. NIHSS score and arteriographic findings in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2005; 36(10):2121-5. [DOI:10.1161/01.STR.0000182099.04994.fc] [PMID] [DOI:10.1161/01.STR.0000182099.04994.fc]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2017 All Rights Reserved | Caspian Journal of Neurological Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb